Client stories from the chart room
Feedback from traders who applied breakout retest criteria to their own instruments — including where the process felt uncomfortable at first.
The Mastery workbook forced me to write down why each level mattered. I realised half my "breakouts" were just noise above a minor intraday high. Fewer trades, better ones.— Tom R., FTSE 100 swing trader, Birmingham
Clinic sessions are worth it for the "trade we skipped" segment alone. Seeing James explain why a retest looked tempting but failed the volume check saved me from repeating old mistakes.— Amara O., commodities CFD trader, London
I wanted more live trading during the cohort — we focused heavily on marking and reviewing. In hindsight that was the right emphasis, though I was impatient in week two.— Chris L., US tech equities, Edinburgh
Chart review caught that my stop was inside the retest wick zone on a GBP/USD setup. Moved it below the prior swing low and the trade survived the pullback.— Fiona W., FX part-timer, Bristol
The half-day workshop in Bakewell was hands-on — printed charts, coloured pens, marking levels together. Much clearer than watching slides.— Mark T., retired engineer learning equities, Derby
Still adjusting to waiting. My instinct is to buy the break. The retest checklist is on a sticky note above my monitor. Slow progress, but real.— Nina P., growth stocks, Cardiff
Case note: rebuilding a watchlist around retest levels
Client: Priya S., Leeds · Programme: Breakout Retest Mastery, autumn 2025
Priya arrived with two years of inconsistent swing trading on UK and US mid-caps. Her journal showed a pattern: strong reads on direction, poor timing on entries. She typically bought the first hourly candle through resistance and moved stops when price pulled back.
During week one we stripped her watchlist to twelve names and rebuilt level marks using prior-week highs, range boundaries from the last twenty sessions, and volume nodes from daily charts. By week three she had a written retest checklist: wick rejection at the level, close back above on the retest candle, volume lower than the breakout bar.
Over the six-week period she took nine retest entries meeting all criteria and skipped fourteen setups that failed one or more checks. Average loss per trade dropped from 1.4% to 0.9% of account equity because stops sat below defined structure rather than arbitrary percentages.
Priya continued with monthly chart reviews for two sessions after the cohort to tighten her target placement at the next visible liquidity zone.
Case note: clinic discipline for a part-time FX trader
Client: David K., Manchester · Programme: Weekly Structure Clinic (8 sessions)
David traded EUR/USD and GBP/USD around his engineering job — mostly London open and early New York overlap. He joined clinics to stop overtrading during volatile breakouts of Asian session ranges.
Each Thursday we reviewed one live FX setup: marking the Asian range high, noting the London breakout, and deciding whether the retest offered a valid entry. David's breakthrough came in session five when he correctly identified a false retest — price touched the level but closed back inside the range on heavy volume. He logged it as a "correct skip" in his journal for the first time.
After eight weeks his trade count dropped by roughly a third while his journal showed more consistent R-multiples on trades taken. He noted that the hardest part was accepting empty days as productive.
Share your chart process with us
Tell us what you trade, how you mark levels today, and which programme might fit.
Send an enquiry